Daniel from Microsoft’s Identity team has been driving the Microsoft DID effort for years and has been pushing Bitcoin as the storage layer for that entire time.
Daniel can fight for whatever storage mechanism he wants, it's not defined how the DID should be stored in the specification so people are free to store them however they want.
Then some group comes along and uses sustainability as signal against DIDs, when DID has nothing to do with Bitcoin or blockchain? Feels like the motivation for this "response" comes from somewhere else than "please think of the planet".
Then some group comes along and uses sustainability as signal against DIDs, when DID has nothing to do with Bitcoin or blockchain? Feels like the motivation for this "response" comes from somewhere else than "please think of the planet".