[mrjangles]

I'm not sure how News Corp is earning revenue from free to air tv stations it doesn't own. I tried googling it and can't find anything so maybe you could enlighten me on this?

As for your other points. If you try to stand back and be objective, the fact that 60% of newspaper readers are forced to read 23% of newspapers should indicate that Newscorp is the only company offering them the choice of media they desire. This would indicate it is the other media companies that are attempting to corner the market and push their views onto people.

The situation becomes even clearer when you look at who is being targeted by whom. Newscorp media online is all paid for and pay walled. They target mature audiences and the rich. Their competition on the other hand offers free products, and they advertise relentlessly on Facebook and other social media. They intentionally target young and groups who are more vulnerable to manipulation.

Finally, a conversation with someone who reads the ABC, or other government products is enough to close the case. These people are always full of extremely hateful, emotional, and even sometimes violent rhetoric (just look at some of the comments on here). Meanwhile if you have a conversation with someone who reads a Newscorp product it will always be fact based and unemotional, and they will almost always be older and more mature.

[thornjm]

Sorry for the late reply. This is what comes up when I google News Corp: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corp_Australia#Television