Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by boardwaalk 1731 days ago
It depends on what you mean by “replace” Docker Desktop, but Podman can run a VM on macOS and has replaced Docker Desktop for me. There’s no fancy (useless) UI nor Windows support yet though.
3 comments
jonfw 1731 days ago
Windows works via a "Bring your own VM" approach, but since WSL exists I'd expect most Windows users would just run it there
link
flatiron 1731 days ago
When you install Docker desktop and already have wsl2 installed you get a pop up saying “you just want us to use wsl2?” And away you go. At least that’s what happened when I did it 6 months ago. Works great!
link
maple3142 1731 days ago
If you don't need to run `docker` command under Windows, install docker directly from distro repo is enough. No need to run another background service. Another benefit is it is faster to build docker images when the files are large, because it doesn't need to move files between WSL VMs.
link
gavinray 1731 days ago
I thought there was Windows support for Podman the same way that Docker Desktop provides Windows support -- primarily through WSL2?
link
otterley 1731 days ago
AFAICT podman machine relies on VirtualBox. This would be an enormous performance and resource regression on MacOS — Docker Desktop uses the much more performant and resource-conscious native hypervisor frameworks instead.
link
muizelaar 1731 days ago
podman machine uses qemu with Hypervisor.framework on macOS
link
otterley 1731 days ago
Oh, nice! Thanks for the correction.
link