|
|
|
|
|
by zentiggr
1731 days ago
|
|
Hit the nail on the head: "if it can be implemented...?" We're talking 50 individual state governments here. We all know that federal, state, and local govt IT practices are basically troubled at best, disastrously shoddy at worst, the only way I would accept this idea is if it was a completely optional, user-chosen, option for an ID. I would want at least ten years of first adopters getting their lives shafted and/or stolen and/or stalked and/or breached before I'd ever think of even using the optional service. Yes, little trust. |
|
As the experience of Estonia shows, a digital ID can be very useful and effective, but does take some work (they had a big revocation effort to manage, which they were able to do so because their country is so small).
Bigger countries such a Germany have basically punted on this issue.
I'm a big fan and disappointed that California isn't in the vanguard.