| So basically the whole conspiracy theory can only work if there's nanochips in the vaccines. If the goal is some economic advantage the vaccines don't make sense. You would exactly focus on treatment drugs. Not preventative drugs. If the goal is population control you wouldn't introduce a vaccine that's more deadly than the virus. You wouldn't want to damage the loyal citizens and save the disobedient anti-vaxxers. The same goes for the idea that they are working towards a social credit system. You would want the vaccines to work. You would then introduce more dangerous and deadly variants of the virus to wipe all those people not joining the system. It doesn't make sense. For this ploy to make sense there needs to something else. Something valuable to the new world order. Something so valuable that it's worth the risk to inject people with vaccines that are more damaging than the virus itself. Something that allows the NWO to control the people. Thus the conspiracy only makes sense if there's nanochips involved. These versions of the conspiracy are mutually exclusive. Yet I see a bunch of these versions in the Spartacus letter. Why would you fool around with "dangerous" mRNA tech if the goal is to inject nanochips? |