|
|
|
|
|
|
by tharkun__
1723 days ago
|
|
|
I did write most on purpose, instead of all. Looks like your case is one where 100% coverage is a good thing and the cost paid for it is absolutely acceptable - nay needed to be paid. And you didn't just go for 100% and stop there because you hit some metric but you actually did the thing that's more important too ("data coverage"). Kudos! |
|
|