| > When a computer can accurately predict (90%~) sexuality, criminal proclivity etc through facial features then what exactly is 'pseudoscience' about it? 90% is fairly poor regression model success rate. If you're in the 10% of those falsely accused of being a future murderous pedofile based solely on your facial bone structure, then imprisoned or institutionalized for that, I'd think your conclusions on this topic may change. Remember the Blackstone ratio (1). Also, physiognomy was a key attribute of Nazi eugenics goals (2) - that's the rabbit hole this work leads down. It's not about protecting feelings, it's about remembering history and learning from mistakes to protect liberty. Lastly, regarding the goal to predict a person's "sexuality' by any method, I would posit that the motives are most likely strongly against vice for liberty for all. What else would that information be used for, other than to oppress? 1.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_ratio 2.) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275738773_About_Fac... |