I read it. Science is not logic in the same way that a brick building is not a brick. Your description is inconsistent. You differentiate logical theories and scientific theories as different yet you call logic the science of what's possible.
Maybe you were trying to promote understanding over correctness but I would recommend that you do both as such fuzzy wording leads to people inconsistently and incorrectly using the word "science."
Maybe you were trying to promote understanding over correctness but I would recommend that you do both as such fuzzy wording leads to people inconsistently and incorrectly using the word "science."