Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wellthisisgreat 1724 days ago
So it does mean that the chess assumes that the king is never “killed”? It always stood out to me as, what I assumed to be medieval code of conduct that required not killing kings (killing queens is ok)
2 comments

That it is called a queen is also cultural, in Russia, Arabic speaking countries etc it is not a queen but a called a vizier or similar (a high ranking official). Looks like the Europeans changed to queens in their interpretation of chess.
Here in India I've heard both: 'queen' and sometimes, 'minister'.
From a historical lens "queen" is very odd nomenclature. The queen was certainly not the most powerful unit on a battlefield. I doubt more than a handful of prominent queens have ever been on the battlefield at all.
The queen was also historically not such a very powerful chess piece. The rule that the queen roams freely in all directions on the board was established, in her honour, when Queen Isabella I of Castile reigned.
It's also called a "flag" in some places.
You can think of it this way: the goal is to kill the king, but the last two half-moves are trivial, so they are not actually played.