|
|
|
|
|
by asnbft
1722 days ago
|
|
It seems to me that OP's tool is not meant to replace the human creative process, but to support it.
Like an intermediate step in the creative process that allows for more iterations. > Leave creativity for people That seems like a very black and white way of thinking. Where do you draw the line between human and 'machine-assisted' creativity?
The second you start creating a mood board for your next project, you've probably already taken advantage of algorithmic feeds and content aggregators, but it's still you feeding the machine with querys etc. |
|
Algorithmic feeds and content aggregators are for kids or the next cheap "decorator" with designers title. There is a only one historically proven way to be good in something and it is called learning and practicing.