|
|
|
|
|
by meheleventyone
1724 days ago
|
|
But by your own definition none of those billion can be expressing their human nature since all of them have been subject to social conditioning. What I think the OP is getting at is the concept of universal human traits. There’s a big old list of them compiled by an anthropologist here:
https://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm The thing to note is that the golden rule could be a universal as much as murder is. Which is to say the golden rule is continuously reinvented by humans but not necessarily followed by them all. What factors in this are innate versus conditioned are opaque. |
|
Which is not a helpful understanding of human nature at all, which is my point. What I am trying to argue against -- and maybe this is not the intent of the original commenter -- is the idea that the Golden Rule is an innate and inevitable expression of our nature, but say, the horrors of Communism are not.