Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by noxer 1733 days ago
Sorry but this is you first post here and what you claim doesn't make much sense.

He didn't have to pay back the TON investors because the deal included that if the network does not go live by a set date (and the reason isn't telegrams fault) he would return the remaining of the investment not the part used for the development. This is the risk the investors took and they lost. telegram itself only had to pay the sec fine which was peanuts for Durov.

Don't know anything about you other claims so I cant debunk but please post sources so we can check for our self.