|
|
|
|
|
by dessant
1723 days ago
|
|
> What's the harm in simply locking that functionality with a config option? Nothing, there is nothing wrong with educating and informing users, then letting them use an extension privately. Users should not be forced to use unstable versions of Firefox to install an extension locally, nor should it be Mozilla's business to inspect the source code of that extension. What's funny is that even in browsers such as Safari and Chrome you can permanently install a local extension after toggling an option, without being forced to disclose the source code to Apple or Google. Firefox is the only desktop browser that prevents users from installing local extensions, and because Mozilla does not control the platform, malware can trivially bypass their restrictions. |
|