Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gfody 1725 days ago
I like to answer sql questions too and it's like being in a quick draw match with Linoff around. he once blogged about how he's able to find all the new unanswered sql questions so quickly, iirc he made his own search
1 comments

I remember John Skeet saying he would sometimes post a half finished answer just so he could get their first and deter other users then polish it later.

I don't know what the point of that is.

A Jon Skeet encounter made me quit Stack Overflow, never to look back. I asked a question, Jon Skeet came along with an answer that did not answer my question. But his non-answer got 200 upvotes.

I went to meta to talk about how the reputation system is broken if that could happen. Skeet came along and accused me of changing my question, and a bunch of SO fanboys mocked me and told me if I want more reputation I had to try harder.

That's when I knew SO had irreparably changed for the worse.

Oh I had some negative encounter with Jon Skeet as well. For a person that has so much notoriety seemed he was quite defensive about me pointing out his "non-answer" he gave to someone else.

My situation was that I noticed that person asking was on a very basic level and he gave answer that was not correct in context of experience or what was actually asked. Even though technically correct.

This rings true for a lot of discussions online: technically correct, but irrelevant in context. :|
42

/s

Every time I've asked a question on Stack Overflow, I include in the question what I've tried and hasn't worked, or that I'm specifically looking to do what I described and I'm not looking for a link to The XY Problem. It always gets edited out immediately so someone can post an unhelpful solution and get upvotes.
It's a popularity contest. Heavily favored towards those who came along when it first started off.
If his answer was wrong, just accept some other answer then.

Do you have a link to this encounter..?

Yeah, see that's frustrating. The point isn't his answer. The point is that his non-answer got him upvotes from his fans, and that when I tried to address this broken reputation system in meta, people aggressively missed the point exactly like you did.
If no one understands what you mean, might the problem lie elsewhere?
But at least some people did understand his point. I did, for example.
I think that is quite sensible, so multiple people do not (unknowingly) spend time writing the same answer.