|
|
|
|
|
by dwaite
1735 days ago
|
|
Elsewhere, Sweeney indicated they had no intention of publishing a new iOS version that complied with the current Apple rules, instead targeting a hypothetical future where alternative in-app purchasing was allowed by Apple. Therefore, while they can't publish a new version at the moment because their account is disabled, they have zero intention of publishing a new version under the current iOS App Store rules. The version they were talking about publishing is a new Mac App Store version. I'm curious if people have any good hypothesis on why they would do this, as Epic wants to run their own store and be the one earning commissions. |
|