|
|
|
|
|
by tronicdude
1724 days ago
|
|
“We know that not all people with diabetes are looking for a wearable continuous glucose monitoring device to manage their diabetes." Okay that's pretty bogus. Some people can't afford it, but everyone with diabetes would benefit from a CGM. There's much more to be gained from trends in CGM data than singular data points. (I was diagnosed with Type 1 at 16, been on a CGM for most of that time). |
|
I observe these persistent inaccurate states on the fifth or sixth day using a sensor. Calibration doesn't help. The reading goes wrong and stays wrong.
It probably happens to you, too, but anyone who doesn't test with a glucometer will likely not notice the failure. You will be harmed by these inaccuracies. Persistent inaccuracy is different than the Gaussian (normal) error of a glucometer, which is far more benign.
Also, CGMs are slow. The reading is based on interstitial fluid and lags direct blood glucose test by 15 minutes or more.
I have completely abandoned the Dexcom G6 and have gone back to 16x daily finger stick blood testing. I am also on a low-carb/high-fat diet, which makes it easy to maintain normal human blood glucose. My HbA1c has been 4.9 for a decade.
I was overjoyed to use the CGM at first, but it turned out to be a net loss. If you want to control your diabetes, use a glucometer and adhere to a strict low-carb/high-fat (ketogenic) diet.