|
|
|
|
|
by ashtonkem
1723 days ago
|
|
Sure. But I’d question two things: 1) How often do you actually need to read your framework. I used rails for years and read probably less than 2KLOC out of it, ditto with Java and Spring. Good documentation beats out small code bases. 2) How much of the size difference between these two is down to age and uses? Is React so big because it’s unfocused or poorly written, or is that a consequence of it being used by so many people and projects? If it’s the latter, shouldn’t we expect that this project will end up growing if it got popular, eroding the benefit of its small size.? |
|
This brings us full circle to the question that started this conversation branch:
> it’s great until you hit a bug, and then you realize you have no idea what’s going on under all the automagical stuff
With React and Rails, "hitting a bug" is apparently rare. Maybe we should wait before assuming it will be any different with this Reactive Clojure framework.