|
|
|
|
|
by Applejinx
1724 days ago
|
|
Girard and thus Thiel hold that "If there is a normal order in societies, it must be the fruit of an anterior crisis." They're not wrong that this is A source of order, but they overlook the human tendency to form community and cooperate: this vision of theirs is about how to form societies when they are by definition all against all, a brutal struggle of nihilism and despair. That's only one way humans can be, and it's a way that competes with the more leftist tendency to make everything about the community and cooperation. Seems like a meta-narrative is needed that incorporates both of these positions that are held by their supporters as the ONLY position that can exist. |
|
Girard does not embrace a Hobbesian view of the world, he is trying to explain the origin of human cooperation and society. The scapegoat narrative is not a nihilistic war of all-against-all it is a narrative of all-against-one to create order. Human cooperation can exist when violence is pared-down to one person (the scapegoat).
Where Girard admits that nihilism can come into play is when the scapegoat narrative becomes openly acknowledged. Which is what he argues Christianity effectively did (opened up the scapegoat mechanism for all to see, thus rendering it ineffective). Girard predicts that our lack of a scapegoat mechanism will likely lead to apocalyptic violence.
Frankly, I think the leftist view that humans can cooperate out-of-the-head-of-Zeus is naive and needs no account, because it has never happened.