The legal system basically believes in itself, and trusts that its own rules are well-considered.
If the other party has 90 days to respond to something you say or do, that's because people have discussed how long is reasonable in this class of situation, and decided on 90 days as a a reasonable threshold. One party benefits if the deadline is short so the other doesn't have much time to respond, the other benefits if it has more time. Someone has thought about it and decided on fair rules. Acting by the rules is not seen as abuse because the rules have been carefully considered, see?
Not acting on a verdict until it's final is regarded as acceptable because the meaning of "final" is that now you have to act on it. Again, carefully considered.
As far as I know, she affirmed that not only could Apple do this, but could also (at its discretion) remove other Epic developer accounts as well - now that the verdict is in.
If the other party has 90 days to respond to something you say or do, that's because people have discussed how long is reasonable in this class of situation, and decided on 90 days as a a reasonable threshold. One party benefits if the deadline is short so the other doesn't have much time to respond, the other benefits if it has more time. Someone has thought about it and decided on fair rules. Acting by the rules is not seen as abuse because the rules have been carefully considered, see?
Not acting on a verdict until it's final is regarded as acceptable because the meaning of "final" is that now you have to act on it. Again, carefully considered.