|
|
|
|
|
by sayonaraman
1736 days ago
|
|
I watched most of it, the coroner report and testimony alone should have been sufficient as reasonable doubt, not to mention police training materials and witness testimony which showed Chauvin did exactly as instructed per standard procedure, not to mention aggressive crowd including a former MMA fighter threatening the officers and diverting their attention during arrest, not to mention Floyd's prior history of high BP and heart problems, and earlier arrest where he ended up in hospital under the same circumstances, not to mention the lethal dose of fentanyl combined with meth in his system, not to mention prosecution not able to procure any evidence of Floyd dying from neck restraint besides speculation and emotional speeches. Chauvin's lawyer did a decent job, but it was a travesty of justice with politicians demanding "the right verdict" or else cities will burn and aggressive mobs outside intimidating the jury, not to mention an actual BLM activist on the jury. It was a 'banana republic' style trial. |
|
Multiple witnesses testified that Floyd continued to plea that he cannot breathe. The witnesses said they all - as bystanders - were concerned for Floyd‘s life.
And I think Chauvin‘s lawyer did a horrible job. He came across as smug. He went on endless tangents, tiring out witnesses and jurors.
But that‘s not why Chauvin is going to jail. And neither are the protests. Someone died at the hands of police officers because his breathing had been constricted through the use of force. The victim had verbalized that he couldn‘t breathe, and it had also been evident to bystanders.
I can say that I never want to be in the position in which Floyd found himself. He was made into a pure object of police force. He was not being heard, not with his own voice, and not even with other people standing next to him speaking on his behalf. In my view, it would be a banana republic if the courts would uphold such behavior on the part of government force.