|
|
|
|
|
|
by dijit
1725 days ago
|
|
|
If they could be replaced then the notion of it being illegal because they were "absolutely required" should be called into question. You can't make it illegal to strike on the grounds of it being dangerous; then fire everyone for it with little or no issue: it just tells us that the reasons for it being illegal were bullshit. |
|
|