|
|
|
|
|
|
by xyzzy21
1739 days ago
|
|
|
Actually it IS what it's saying indirectly. Case law stating that police have ZERO DUTY or LEGAL OBLIGATION to protect goes back to the 1850s. This case is merely the latest is in literally DOZENS of examples of case law saying this. The Constitution and US case law very literally and repeated has said: "Your own protection is 100% ONLY on you" And honestly this is why the 2nd amendment still is relevant and universal to all individuals. |
|
|