Some are more disinclined to work though. It is why ADHD exists. Stimulants helps you become more inclined to work, so laziness is at least partially dependent on chemicals.
I mean, if taking a pill can make someone less lazy then laziness must be a thing, right?
I hope you’re not speaking to my up-thread mention of ADHD. A pill has not made me less, or more, lazy. Or +- prone to procrastinating. To the extent it’s helped with executive function it’s just made me less at odds with the world’s assumptions about how I exist.
In a similar way that "broken" is a thing. If you have a device which doesn't work, you can call it "broken" but that doesn't help you do anything about it. It's useful if you want to filter out broken things from functional things, but if you want your device to work again you need more than that.
If you want to avoid lazy employees, and hire motivated self-starters, then "lazy" might work as a description. If a good employee is suddenly having problems and you would prefer to keep them, all "lazy" does is put a non-explanation insult on them, it doesn't tell you anything. "They lost a family member and haven't been sleeping properly and are exhausted" tells you something. "They just saw another team's project get cancelled on a whim" tells you something else. "They feel micromanaged and are frustrated" tells you something else.
That’s really not true. Some people genuinely love their jobs and continue to work well into old age even if the remuneration is basically irrelevant. It’s perfectly possible to love your job to the point where the salary is as much to just pay the bills, and I’ve been fortunate to be in that position several times in my career.
I mean, if taking a pill can make someone less lazy then laziness must be a thing, right?