[globular-toast]

Bitbucket Cloud and Bitbucket On-prem are two entirely separate products. It makes about as much sense as you can expect from Atlassian. The former was a Mercurial thing that they purchased then later removed Mercurial support. The latter used to be called Stash.

We moved from Bitbucket On-prem to Gitlab and I must admit I do miss parts of Bitbucket's UI. It was much easier to find reviews you needed to do and it was much clearer when reviewers had finished reviewing and if work needed to be done. Gitlab should just copy this stuff.

[jschumacher]

I was the head of product for the developer tools at Atlassian in 2012. We thought long and hard about taking Bitbucket cloud and packaging it in a VM (which is what GitHub did at the time) or leveraging the platforms we’ve already built for Confluence and Jira that would give us access control and a plug-in system from day 1. It was a tough call.

Ultimately we’ve decided to build on top of our server platforms and target companies with 1000+ employees from day one. That decision had a huge impact on how we approached performance and what features we prioritised. The hierarchy of projects and permissions associated with them as well as the way we designed Pull Requests are good examples of that.

It was the right decision at the time, even if the product happened to be different in cloud and server, which did lead to some confusion. But Stash customers were really happy with the product.