|
|
|
|
|
|
by zepto
1731 days ago
|
|
|
> Arguably, any instance where such enforcement mechanism fails to happen in response to an infraction in law, or fails be applied consistently to all actors, is a failure of said enforcement mechanism in totality No, that’s not ‘arguable’. It’s ridiculous and obviously wrong. > there is much point in me spoon feeding you more stuff Or, far more likely, you simply can’t actually produce a good example. Given that you could simultaneously prove me wrong and inform other people by doing so, I think it’s clear this is just bluster. |
|
|
I'm arguing it now, you may disagree, but I can for sure tell you that If I had at least 5 felonies like certain corporations do (and the exact same ones they were charged with and merely paid punitive fines for that barely scratched the surface of the profits extracted), I certainly would not be able to continue to operate in certain jurisdictions like they can and continue to do. You may not think such is a utter failure of enforcement, but I do. Thankfully, my actions, thoughts and ideas are not bounded by what you think.
Regardless, there are dao's that are not incorporated in any jurisdiction and are sufficiently decentralized that even if any one or many of their actors that are distributed in many jurisdictions we're arrested or killed, their evm deployed contracts will continue operate just fine regardless of what you or I think of such dao's and the assets of such daos, will remain out of reach of punitive actions of any particular jurisdiction.
> Given that you could simultaneously prove me wrong and inform other people by doing so, I think it’s clear this is just bluster.
Right, ignore the social and non finance related dao's listed in the link I provided, and continue to form your opinions strictly based on someone else definitions of "goodness" or "badness". All just bluster ;)