|
|
|
|
|
by ryanSrich
1734 days ago
|
|
Extreme outliers. You have a better shot at winning the lottery or being struck by lightning than ever having a company that resembles Facebook or Amazon in any way, including founder compensation and ownership. To answer the question though it’s all about leverage. You can’t go into a situation like VC funding without it. Leverage can almost be anything, but is commonly: - revenue - traction with customers - traction with users (if d2c) - a previous exit - nepotism It’s in a VCs best interest to take as much of the company as possible without causing disruption. That means making you feel like you didn’t get shafted in the deal. This dynamic shifts when you have leverage. So instead of you taking a term sheet and just eating whatever they give you, with leverage you set the terms. But again, you’ll need a lot of leverage, likely almost every point above, in order to get a deal that isn’t complete garbage (save for nepotism). |
|
You Lone the opportunity to be your own boss and the possibility of extreme upside. But it sounds like VCs are taking that away as well.
I wonder if any VCs have added options into the deal to increase founder equity later if company performance dramatically outperforms expectations.