[overgard]

I think the author is confusing art and design. Art is all the things he says are great: challenging, messy, unconvential, etc. etc. But design in a lot of ways is more about empathy and engineering. Someone wants to do something and you're figuring out how to make that as understandable and efficient as possible. You don't need to be super creative to make a great design, you need to understand what the person is trying to do and make solving that as obvious as possible. IMO this guy wants "design" to be Art, and that's just confusing most of the time.

If I'm downloading some app it's probably because I need it to do something. I don't give a shit about the designer's ego, I do not need my mind blown, I just want to do the thing I set out to do and move on with my life.

The problem with most design is everyone thinks they're the next incarnation of Steve Jobs and if they just get rid of more buttons and make their typography really really nice everyone will see their creative genius. So we're constantly dealing with apps and their "bold" redesigns of things that everyone understood perfectly fine before. It's incredibly frustrating. Even reading what this guy is doing on his site, it's like reinventing all the built in apps that work fine with "Bold" new versions. Yeah, I don't really need a bold new calculator or weather app.

[Gualdrapo]

Art is about oneself. Design is about others.

As a graphic designer myself, most (if not all) of the colleagues I've ever met want to feel sometimes like they're artists. Since I've working for the web even before I was studying graphic design at uni I never could understand why is that goal.

I don't think this is a "Steve Jobs" thing, Jobs wasn't even a designer nor programmer but a marketeer, and a successful one. It comes way before than him, and it reaches all branches of graphic design - until at the end of the day you remember you're trying to communicate something to _someone else_.