| They have a POV, but I wouldn't call it a US bias. They're pretty quick to criticize. (It's one of my few regular reads besides HN.) They always post their sources, and then explain any speculation from there. Usually the speculation is more accusative of the US military than anything else, but Russia, China etc also get covered. Now, many of the "sources" are US military or other US government FOIA requests or similar, as well as some vets sharing technical details of what their deployment was like, etc. (I actually think they have more trouble with bias in proximity to US domestic politics than they do any US bias.) Any US "bias" isn't really a skew of reality, so much as the US military is pretty much the topic the focus on covering. They get giddy about some historical stories, but it's usually more about the tech than the allegiance. Is hacker news biased for having a large number of articles about, or from the POV of, tech/startup/otherwise-HN crow? (excluding comments) Or is it just what the site is about? |