|
|
|
|
|
by baldajan
1735 days ago
|
|
From a pedantic perspective, maybe... another way to put it: real_company_worth = sum(valueOf(technology), valueOf(people), valueOf(assets))
sale_price = max(total_money_raised_owed, real_company_worth)
if sale_price == total_money_raised_owed {
sale_price < real_company_worth // likely, since rarely total_money_raised_owed == real_company_worth
}
Better? |
|
"sale_price < real_company_worth"
This statement in that conditional seems like it could never be true.
If sale_price == total_money_raised_owed, then real_company_worth <= total_money_raised_owed because sale_price = max(total_money_raised_owed, real_company_worth).
Therefore, inside the conditional, sale_price = total_money_raised_owed >= real_company_worth, therefore sale_price >= real_company_worth which is the opposite of sale_price < real_company_worth.
What am I missing? Perhaps you meant min?