[Jolter]

It’s not wrong, it’s all based on scientific evidence. That’s kind of the point of the list.

You got a big list of arguments for one viewpoint. You might want to point to evidence of your opposing view instead of dismissing the science without addressing any of its claims.

[zepto]

It takes more than a single study for something to become ‘science’. Especially in the social sciences, where replication is a real problem.

I’m strongly in agreement with the goal and the sentiment of the project, but not with its execution. We need a lot more epistemic humility and contextualization for this to not just seem like just another political project.

[disgruntledphd2]

Yeah, if they'd read and critiqued at least some of the papers, we would all be more informed rather than outraged.

[zepto]

Right, and compared the stats with other harms etc.