|
> When you are reminded that Citibank lost 0.5 Billions because they spent 0$ on their UI, you may start to understand how much corporates world is rotten to its core and why mainframe is still there. That wasn’t actually on a mainframe or in COBOL, it was an Oracle app (Oracle Forms/Reports, PL/SQL, Java, etc). And, it was a product from an Oracle subsidiary (OFSS), the software itself was not maintained in-house. Although, to complicate the story, that subsidiary was started by Citibank and then sold to Oracle in the mid-2000s. So Citibank no longer directly controls the decision on whether the UI is updated, now that is up to Oracle. They can encourage Oracle to do that, and decide how quickly to upgrade if/when Oracle delivers it, but Oracle controls the actual UI. Or they could decide to look for a new product to replace it with. (Disclaimer: former Oracle employee, was peripherally involved with OFSS banking products during my time at Oracle, although I never had anything to do with Citibank, and I never saw this specific banking product either.) |
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-02-17/citi-c... [2]. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26180785