Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by setgree 1733 days ago
> or a p value of something like p = 0.0001

This has been proposed [0], albeit for a threshold of p < 0.005.

Here's Andy Gelman and others arguing otherwise [1]. They also got like 800 scientists to sign on to the general idea of no longer using statistical significance at all [2].

[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0189-z

[1] http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/ab...

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9

1 comments

Given the (estimated) number of scientists in the world and their general propensity to sign on to something… is 800 scientists a significant amount?
I don't know, and it's a fair point; I think I should have just summarised the follow-up article as "here's some follow-up by the authors for context"