|
|
|
|
|
by frabbit
1739 days ago
|
|
People are not even "selfish". Wanting a nice, stable, predictable environment just like you have had it all your life could be categorized as selfish. And that's fine. Taking a massive gamble on injecting huge amounts of energy into a system which looks like it will be destabilized is just..... foolish? stupid? I dunno. According to the Canadaland podcast there is a recent survey taken during the federal election campaign which suggests that 1 in 4 voters still do not accept anthropogenic climate change as real. I am baffled. Most of us would benefit from some sort of Green New Deal with a re-organization of the economy. I can completely understand the top 5 or 10 percent balking at any shake up of the system on purely economic advantage grounds, but what about all the other 85%? And even with a shake-up I find it hard to believe that any productive/active members of the 5 to 10 percent would not thrive relatively in any new situation and indeed be better off than in a severely disrupted environment. Something other than rationality is going on here. |
|
propaganda has always worked and this specific one is just particularly spectacular because there were so many players involved. They probably weren't coordinated even.
each one was just looking out for themselves but it ended in a global misinformation campaign that's been ongoing for decades now.