[modeless]

Not only is it not valuable to publish tons of studies with p=.04999 and small effect size, in fact it's harmful. With so many questionable results published in supposedly reputable places it becomes possible to "prove" all sorts of crackpot theories by selectively citing real research. And if you try to dispute the studies you can get accused of being anti-science.

[exporectomy]

Only a problem for people who are trying hard not to think. You can just ignore those people. They're not doing any harm believing their beliefs.

[robbedpeter]

The USDA food pyramid and nutrition education would suggest that there's an inherent danger in just letting people believe irrational things after a correction is known. It depends on the belief - flat earth people aren't likely to cause any harm. Bad nutrition information can wreak havoc at scale.

[vkou]

Flat earth beliefs doesn't cause harm, but flat earth believers have largely upgraded to believing more dangerous nonsense.

[exporectomy]

Data or it didn't happen. This really sounds like you're inventing a caricature of your enemy and assigning them "dangerous" qualities so you can hate them more.

[vkou]

Nobody needs to caricature the insane beliefs surrounding COVID (or flat earth), people holding them are doing a good enough job of that themselves.

I do have a few favorites. "COVID tests give you COVID, so I won't go get tested" is certainly up there. I can't say I give two figs about your opinion on the Earth's topology, but this one is a public health problem, that's crippling hospitals around the country.

[exporectomy]

So it didn't happen?

[bee_rider]

We are literally in the middle of a global crisis that is founded on people misunderstanding science.

[exporectomy]

What on earth are you talking about? I guess climate change but that's certainly not founded on people misunderstanding science, it's caused by people understanding science which led to industrialization. Or maybe you mean covid-19? Neither that. You're just trying to make it seem like it's somehow very serious and bad if everyone doesn't agree with you. It's not.

[mrosett]

I’ll presume you’re referring to everyone involved in the gain of function research that led to the virus.