[JackFr]

No we’re stuck with it because average was used colloquially for arithmetic mean for decades.

I wish people would stop bad-mouthing the arithmetic mean. If you have to convey information about a distribution and you’ve got only one number to do it, the arithmetic mean is for you.

[jrochkind1]

I think it still depends on the nature of the data and your questions about it, and median is often the better choice if you have to pick only one.

[hnfong]

“It depends” is always right but which function is better for arbitrary, unknown data?

At least the arithmetic mean is fine for Gaussian distributions, and coneys a sense about the data even on non-Gaussian ones. but the median doesn’t even work at all on some common distributions like scores of very difficult exams (where median=0)

For the mean, at least every data point contributes to the final value.

Just my 2c

[bluesmoon]

Yes, Lotus 123 came out 38 years ago :)