| > You are commenting on a HN story which is literally linking directly to the document they authored. You're conflating the timeline and facts a lot. Here is what you stated happened above: - FDA panelist published a report -> Biden admin asked them to resign -> they resigned. Here is what actually happened: - CDC published a report -> WH accepted the CDC's report -> WH signaled moving forward with boosters -> FDA panelists who never got to publish resign -> FDA panelists author review paper in The Lancet critical of boosters (what this article is about) -> [Future] FDA publish their official recommendation The timelines are completely different (e.g. resign before Vs. after publication), what we're talking about being published is different (e.g. FDA official report Vs. Lancet review), and the whole "asked to resign" is nowhere to be seen. > This is a false and fabricated quotation, which I did not say at any point. You said this verbatim: > Biden administration seems to have asked two multi-decade long FDA vaccine approval experts to resign You haven't defended or sourced that. Want to go ahead and do that rather than acting offended by my shorthand characterization of it? |