|
|
|
|
|
|
by mschuster91
1738 days ago
|
|
|
> NT was developed to be portable and was working on architectures other than x86 in the beginning. NT itself yes, but the userland? Not in the slightest. Apple provided Rosetta runtime translation at each arch transition, MS did not. As a result, no company even thought about switching PCs over to ARM which meant that there also was no incentive for the big players you mentioned to port their software over to RT. |
|
|