[hikingsimulator]

Having watched that video, laowhy presents a biased view on the topic. Not a biased view of China mind you, but because his views echo the triumphant 90s zeitgest that capitalism, liberalism, and what can be cast as a "laissez-faire" attitude (supposedly being necessary to the development of a country) is for him the de-facto aka obvious best system. The underlying thread is still that "Fukuyama take" that capitalism and liberalism are the end-of-history.

Laowhy provides a compelling narrative, but it also feels like it is just that: a narrative.

China as a country has endured and has at hand many more tools to ensure its stability. It is not a simple dictature or the USSR, which could be brought to its knees via a mix of political and economic ostracism.

The video sadly feels like some feel-good geopolitical video for westerners: "don't worry about China because China worries about itself and hides it, badly".

[enaaem]

Are there any specific points in the video you disagree with?

Just saying something is biased does not make you correct. It is just very elaborate way to say “oh no it isn’t!”.

[throw3434053]

Laowhy only offers this slimey smug clickbait view of China that is exactly what American powers want people to believe. He is constantly releasing videos saying "China will fall any day now!", it is just giving people what they want to hear and it's totally reasonable for this person to point out how biased and uncritical he is.

[hikingsimulator]

The other answer to your message offers the gist of my point.

Laowhy does not offer the research that backs his point besides the general doxa around China. I don't see why I should have to prove a negative.

China has many issues, but the feel-good doomsday rhetoric offered by Laowhy does not help OP's argument especially when channels like Polymatter have covered those issues, better, with less bias and more down-to-earth conclusions.