|
|
|
|
|
|
by kevin_thibedeau
1738 days ago
|
|
|
It is explicitly for the benefit of YouTube. It is possible to make a non-antagonistic system that complies with DMCA: Respond to the takedown upon receipt and give account holders an easy path to restore the disputed content under fair use or for invalid claims. Then the originator of the claim can use the normal legal process and Google is off the hook as a safe harbor. Google doesn't want to do that because they're in bed with the media companies to get favorable treatment on their paid services. |
|
|