|
|
|
|
|
by jrootabega
1743 days ago
|
|
Is there any information to back that up? I think it's more likely that ESPs would gladly ignore a few people in favor of their paying customers, especially since in these cases they can write those people off as "cranky privacy crackpots" who don't contribute to the consumer culture they thrive in. |
|
I believe the incentives are more aligned than you might think. An ESP isn’t risking revenue by telling a customer that something’s not working and making them fix it. All parties know that ignoring it manifests in poor deliverability, often quickly (thanks, Gmail “Spam” button!). In my experience, your skepticism is justified about ESPs permanently shutting off a customer, but they’re comfortable doing anything short of that.