|
|
|
|
|
by bullsbarry
5438 days ago
|
|
It's a little less severe than that. First the device has to support remote management, then the device has to have remote management turned on, and finally the attacker would have to have the device's serial number (which seems to be used as a security mechanism) in order to successfully send the device commands. Also, if you don't like needles, don't watch the youtube video at the bottom of the post :| |
|
Not to mention that some devices may be controlled by the monitoring device and it may require a constant stream of good data.
I agree that not all setups and individuals are at risk but some most likely are.