|
|
|
|
|
|
by tialaramex
1740 days ago
|
|
|
> It's an address space expansion Exactly this. There is no "backwards compatible" way to have more addresses in a protocol that's wedded to 32-bit addresses. That's just how numbers work. The protocol with a larger address space will be incompatible, and so anybody who seems surprised/ disappointed hasn't even really thought about the problem. |
|
|