|
|
|
|
|
|
by IG_Semmelweiss
1739 days ago
|
|
|
I thought so at first. I think poster got so caught up in explaining the Greek that he forgot to make his point. For a while, it seemed like poster was arguing semantics vs actually informing the reader on why author could be wrong. I'm not sure how to present it better, but I'd posit: "Sparta, the city, was not 80% slaves. That stat only true about the state. This distinction only matters because the author is critizing sparta society on the basis that Sparta's seat of power was slave-cornucopia. But this is false. Sparta the city is mostly spartan citizens, making the author's criticism-by-sleight-of-hand dishonest" |
|
|