|
|
|
|
|
by ahachete
1743 days ago
|
|
If using SSD or similar fast storage subsystem, or those that hide a higher random access time vs sequential, you may indeed want to reduce random_page_cost to make random_page_cost / seq_page_cost in the 1.2-1.5 range. But it's also wise to review the default_statistics_target being used, that autovacuum is running frequently enough (which does autoanalyze), that the analyze thresholds are also properly tuned... Thank you for mentioning https://postgresqlco.nf Team member here :) All these parameters mentioned here are well documented there, with recommendations. Also, have you tried the Tuning Guide? (https://postgresqlco.nf/tuning-guide) |
|