|
|
|
|
|
by leggomuhgreggo
1749 days ago
|
|
The more worrisome "inversion of speech" would seem to be that institutions have the same free speech rights as humans. Social media platforms are increasingly akin to the pubic forums of old, where essentially all meaningful exchange of ideas takes place — and where excommunication functions like "free speech zones" designed to marginalize and render the exercise of political expression inert. I would suggest a relevant precedent might be laws limiting media ownership. I'd also point out that institutions of a certain size exercise control over human in a similar way to governments — and the "private business" distinction becomes increasingly blurry when we consider how deeply these companies collide with law enforcement and govt agencies to censor information. It's a complicated topic! |
|
In fact funnily enough the ancient Board of Presidents is really not that different from Facebook's community oversight board. You will not find any public assembly in history that did not enact rules of conduct and excluded offenders if necessary.
[1]https://studyingreece.edu.gr/7-rules-of-public-speaking-in-a...