|
|
|
|
|
by chasd00
1746 days ago
|
|
The problem with MAD is it requires perfect decision making or perfect luck with no graceful failure if things go wrong. From the Cuban Missile Crisis portion of Fog of War "Lesson #2: Rationality will not save us. I want to say, and this is very important: at the end we lucked out. It was luck that prevented nuclear war. We came that close to nuclear war at the end. Rational individuals: Kennedy was rational; Khrushchev was rational; Castro was rational. Rational individuals came that close to total destruction of their societies. And that danger exists today." https://www.errolmorris.com/film/fow_transcript.html |
|
I'm all for arms reduction that maintains strategic deterrence. Everyone knows that MAD is, well, mad -- but the real question is whether it is more or less mad than the alternatives, and the leading alternative is to trust a bunch of sovereign nations to act together against their best interest, and that's even more mad than MAD.