[tikhonj]

My experience is that all my code gets thrown away or rewritten at some point. I've seen what code that doesn't get rewritten looks like; I'm intent on never inflicting anything like that on the world.

As far as types go, I've found that types actually help more during prototyping than later on. (At least for code I've written myself; types are great for helping me navigate other people's long-term codebases!)

Types give me a way to sketch out and iterate on an overall design without needing to implement anywhere near all the logic I'd need; then, when I start in on the logic, it naturally lays down on the skeleton the types provide. Compared to my experience with Python—where I still use some types!—I've found it easier to start and quickly try different designs in Haskell.

[philosopher1234]

>My experience is that all my code gets thrown away or rewritten at some point. I've seen what code that doesn't get rewritten looks like; I'm intent on never inflicting anything like that on the world.

I believe most code is old. You mostly notice code that changes.

[12thwonder]

good point. Yes, during prototype phase, rigid typing actually helps quite a bit. I still do that myself, simply because I don't have to "run" the program to see if I'm on the right path when I'm just sketching things out.

I guess what I wanted to say is that, in the long run, compile-time checks may become runtime checks, especially something like enum values where at the beginning, enums are fine choice but soon you will find yourself where you have to store that to a DB etc.

Problem is, moving from compile-time check to runtime check isn't that straightforward in a lot of cases.