[Raineer]

As a Boulderite and a huge fan of NIST, I am bummed out that the misleading headline does come from NIST itself and not an overzealous contributor.

Exciting results, all the same.

[blondin]

wait, how is what they wrote misleading?

[prutschman]

It's not literally false, but I got an inaccurate impression based on the headline. To me it implied a positive discovery of evidence rather than a ruling-out.

If they'd said "determined new constraints on a hypothetical 5th force" or something I would have gotten a correct impression.