|
|
|
|
|
|
by bogomipz
1741 days ago
|
|
|
Agreed. This is extra bizarre considering their own documentation on the purpose of IAM unique IDS states: >"However, every IAM user has a unique ID, even if you create a new IAM user that reuses a friendly name you deleted before. In the example, the old IAM user David and the new IAM user David have different unique IDs. You can create resource-based policies that grant access by unique ID and not just by user name. Doing so reduces the chance that you could inadvertently grant access to information that an employee should not have"[1] [1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_i... |
|
|