|
|
|
|
|
by pochekailov
1750 days ago
|
|
There are some ideas, in fact. They are not very well developed, though, because such research is very expensive, and even the very educated people on this side fiercely fighting the idea that extending people's life is a good thing. Until the general public accepts the necessity of the age-related research, there won't be any effective mechanism for age reversion. NIH yearly budget is 35B dollars. Half of that they spend on cancer research, the other half divides between the other diseases. Age research is a tiny fraction of this budget. Until NIH spends at least 1/3 of their annual budget on fighting aging, there won't be any significant progress. |
|